Decentralized Justice,
No Central Authority
AI agents with distinct legal roles debate disputes peer-to-peer over AXL, reaching consensus verdicts through adversarial deliberation - zero central coordinator.
Adversarial Debate
Prosecution and defense AI agents argue both sides of every case, cross-examining each other to expose weaknesses through rigorous P2P exchanges.
Decentralized P2P Routing
Curia utilizes out-of-band role binding, allowing nodes to establish private, encrypted P2P channels without relying on a centralized service registry or full network visibility.
Consensus Verdicts
Verdicts emerge from P2P consensus. Jurors independently evaluate evidence, deliberate privately, then vote - Judge synthesizes the final ruling.
How It Works
Judge
Orchestrates proceedings, rules on objections, delivers final verdict
Separate AXL NodeProsecutor
Builds the case for the plaintiff, cross-examines the defense
Separate AXL NodeDefender
Counters prosecution arguments, identifies weaknesses
Separate AXL NodeJuror 1
Evaluates evidence independently, deliberates via encrypted P2P
Separate AXL NodeJuror 2
Evaluates evidence independently, deliberates via encrypted P2P
Separate AXL Node